Sunday, April 14, 2013
RIGHT TO TRAVEL PACKAGE FOR 99.00 DOLLARS
For "Affidavits of travel and warning is a very powerful document."
You will also get my custom private Photo Identification Affidavit.
A set of custom notices stickers you need to put all around your private AUTOMOBILE.
Just fill in your information and you are done, Then have them notarized.
Make copies of originals and keep in your AUTOMOBILE.
Remember this paperwork is private and never to be put on the public.
Please do not share all my paperwork is custom made and Copyright Intellectual Material.
If buying SPC this package is free, Otherwise a donation of 99.00 dollars is required.
Everything has instructions so follow them.
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
RIGHT TO TRAVEL INFORMATION NEWSLETTER
Right to Travel
DESPITE ACTIONS OF POLICE AND LOCAL COURTS,
HIGHER COURTS HAVE RULED THAT AMERICAN CITIZENS
HAVE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL WITHOUT STATE PERMITS
For years professionals within the criminal justice system have acted on the belief that traveling by motor vehicle was a privilege that was given to a citizen only after approval by their state government in the form of a permit or license to drive. In other words, the individual must be granted the privilege before his use of the state highways was considered legal. Legislators, police officers, and court officials are becoming aware that there are court decisions that disprove the belief that driving is a privilege and therefore requires government approval in the form of a license. Presented here are some of these cases:
CASE #1: "The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.
CASE #2: "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.
It could not be stated more directly or conclusively that citizens of the states have a common law right to travel, without approval or restriction (license), and that this right is protected under the U.S Constitution.
CASE #3: "The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.
CASE #4: "The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.
As hard as it is for those of us in law enforcement to believe, there is no room for speculation in these court decisions. American citizens do indeed have the inalienable right to use the roadways unrestricted in any manner as long as they are not damaging or violating property or rights of others. Government -- in requiring the people to obtain drivers licenses, and accepting vehicle inspections and DUI/DWI roadblocks without question -- is restricting, and therefore violating, the people's common law right to travel.
Is this a new legal interpretation on this subject? Apparently not. This means that the beliefs and opinions our state legislators, the courts, and those in law enforcement have acted upon for years have been in error. Researchers armed with actual facts state that case law is overwhelming in determining that to restrict the movement of the individual in the free exercise of his right to travel is a serious breach of those freedoms secured by the U.S. Constitution and most state constitutions. That means it is unlawful. The revelation that the American citizen has always had the inalienable right to travel raises profound questions for those who are involved in making and enforcing state laws. The first of such questions may very well be this: If the states have been enforcing laws that are unconstitutional on their face, it would seem that there must be some way that a state can legally put restrictions -- such as licensing requirements, mandatory insurance, vehicle registration, vehicle inspections to name just a few -- on a citizen's constitutionally protected rights. Is that so?
For the answer, let us look, once again, to the U.S. courts for a determination of this very issue. In Hertado v. California, 110 US 516, the U.S Supreme Court states very plainly:
"The state cannot diminish rights of the people."
And in Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60,
"Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void."
Would we not say that these judicial decisions are straight to the point -- that there is no lawful method for government to put restrictions or limitations on rights belonging to the people? Other cases are even more straight forward:
"The assertion of federal rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice." Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, at 24
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.
"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. US, 230 F 486, at 489.
There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights." Sherer v. Cullen, 481 F 946
We could go on, quoting court decision after court decision; however, the Constitution itself answers our question - Can a government legally put restrictions on the rights of the American people at anytime, for any reason? The answer is found in Article Six of the U.S. Constitution:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;...shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or laws of any State to the Contrary not one word withstanding."
In the same Article, it says just who within our government that is bound by this Supreme Law:
"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution..."
Here's an interesting question. Is ignorance of these laws an excuse for such acts by officials? If we are to follow the letter of the law, (as we are sworn to do), this places officials who involve themselves in such unlawful acts in an unfavorable legal situation. For it is a felony and federal crime to violate or deprive citizens of their constitutionally protected rights. Our system of law dictates that there are only two ways to legally remove a right belonging to the people. These are:
by lawfully amending the constitution, or
by a person knowingly waiving a particular right.
Some of the confusion on our present system has arisen because many millions of people have waived their right to travel unrestricted and volunteered into the jurisdiction of the state. Those who have knowingly given up these rights are now legally regulated by state law and must acquire the proper permits and registrations. There are basically two groups of people in this category:
Citizens who involve themselves in commerce upon the highways of the state. Here is what the courts have said about this: "...For while a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, that right does not extend to the use of the highways...as a place for private gain. For the latter purpose, no person has a vested right to use the highways of this state, but it is a privilege...which the (state) may grant or withhold at its discretion..." State v. Johnson, 245 P 1073. There are many court cases that confirm and point out the difference between the right of the citizen to travel and a government privilege and there are numerous other court decisions that spell out the jurisdiction issue in these two distinctly different activities. However, because of space restrictions, we will leave it to officers to research it further for themselves.
The second group of citizens that is legally under the jurisdiction of the state are those citizens who have voluntarily and knowingly waived their right to travel unregulated and unrestricted by requesting placement under such jurisdiction through the acquisition of a state driver's license, vehicle registration, mandatory insurance, etc. (In other words, by contract.) We should remember what makes this legal and not a violation of the common law right to travel is that they knowingly volunteer by contract to waive their rights. If they were forced, coerced or unknowingly placed under the state's powers, the courts have said it is a clear violation of their rights. This in itself raises a very interesting question. What percentage of the people in each state have applied for and received licenses, registrations and obtained insurance after erroneously being advised by their government that it was mandatory?
Many of our courts, attorneys and police officials are just becoming informed about this important issue and the difference between privileges and rights. We can assume that the majority of those Americans carrying state licenses and vehicle registrations have no knowledge of the rights they waived in obeying laws such as these that the U.S. Constitution clearly states are unlawful, i.e. laws of no effect - laws that are not laws at all. An area of serious consideration for every police officer is to understand that the most important law in our land which he has taken an oath to protect, defend, and enforce, is not state laws and city or county ordinances, but the law that supersedes all other laws -- the U.S. Constitution. If laws in a particular state or local community conflict with the supreme law of our nation, there is no question that the officer's duty is to uphold the U.S. Constitution.
Every police officer should keep the following U.S. court ruling -- discussed earlier -- in mind before issuing citations concerning licensing, registration, and insurance:
"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime." Miller v. US, 230 F 486, 489.
And as we have seen, traveling freely, going about one's daily activities, is the exercise of a most basic right.
Audit letter to any debt and watch creditor go away
From
:
John Doe
777
Delmas Avenue, 2
San
Jose, California [90000]
May
16th, 2013
To
Jill
Warner, Account Manager, Nelnet
P.O.
Box xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lincoln,
NE 777777
In
regards to: UNFINISHED BUSINESS Account # 777777777
John:
Doe non-adverse, non-belligerent, non-combatant party, secure party
creditor with power of attorney general, authorization representative
on behalf of John: Doe, is in possession of your recent voluntary
submission of evidentiary documents.
jill
warner, account manager, must
herein provide a true and certified copy of the complete audit trail
of said account. furthermore, in order for jill warner
to validate the debt, please provide verification through audit
certification of debt entry in accordance with g.a.a.p., i.f.r.s., in
accordance with basel 3 accord and u.n.c.i.t.r.a.l. Conventions.
Failure
to substantiate the claim, Please settle account immediately
Sincerely,
John:
Doe
Friday, March 29, 2013
Becoming Secure Party Creditor is
Full proof Asset Protection Period.
American Governance
A Brief History Of The Corporate Fiction
Both systems concurrently exist today. However, the corporate system has been gaining predominance in the last 70 years. Many Natural Living Man Aka (We the people) have contracted with the corporate system unknowingly, unintentionally, and or without full disclosure given.
Once you learn the difference, you may have to make a decision for yourself, family and posterity. That decision may require changes in how you conduct yourself.
You will have to undo what has been done to make your new secure status known.
This is not taught in the corporate government's public school system, because you are not to know.
The elite of the "One World government" corporate system want
and need to have power and control over the population (masses)
they call Us
"Human Resources."
What is a secure party creditor?
Answer:
It is a filing done at a government level Aka UCC-1 Financing Statement stating your status declaration to be exact that you, the living man/woman is protecting, The “CREDITOR AND DEBTOR WORKING IN COMMERCE” via multi million dollar “MARITIME LIEN”, against the corporate fiction name created at birth example JOHN DOE.
What is a corporate fiction?
Answer:
JOHN DOE is a person, a fictitious character, a corporation absorbed, Enumerated, Bonded and sold as commodity STOCK in the bond market traded via federal world reserved. It is also a way to function “LEGALLY” in commerce, aKa “UCC uniform commercial code aKa admiralty maritime color of law”
Under this law you only have privileges no rights a DEBT SLAVE Were Codes, licensing, Applications, Contracts, Promissory Notes and other bank related securities apply.
Example:
A license application is nothing more than hidden a contract for privileges, When signed by consent you just surrender your common constitutional rights period.
Another example JOHN DOE has the right to “TRAVEL”, But John Doe BY CONSENT applied for a license to “DRIVE” John just gave away his rights for privileges and now they have the right to lien the straw man name JOHN DOE corporate character working in commerce.
Another example if a policy, I mean police official stops you to lien you with a ticket and he has an constitutional “OATH” to protect you from being lien who and why is he liening you?
Since the straw man bond name is your name in the all CAPS JOHN DOE aKa-capital diminutia and also traded in the bond market all over the international banking cartel system is worth millions.
That is correct the bankers do own all of us at least in paper and you are worth millions in collateral.
REMEMBER THE HOUSE BUBBLE
This so call credit when you the CREDITOR AND DEBTOR signs a promissory note for a property or vehicle.
What is the most important thing they want from you?
Your signatures , Because you create the debt instrument and the banks checks your bond first making sure you have the funds in the first place to create, Then they sell the new debt instrument in the international markets created by you adding more to the deficit.
But they do not tell you the funds originated from your own securities money bond created by them in the first place.
“It is the biggest banking scam ever perpetuated on The American People”
But remember they do not own the human
living being and you as the CREDITOR are fully protected by your bill of rights and constitution, “LAWFUL” CIVIL LAW aKa law of the land or Common Law.
What are the benefits of becoming a SPC?
Answer:
“ASSET PROTECTION PERIOD”
You are no longer lien-able!
Just like your constitution says unalienable rights.
Is also giving you a Non Adversarial, Non Belligerent Party position with the 100 million dollar lien against your birth certificate bond, Becoming immune and fully protected from the out of control corporate government officials, officers and agents.
A simple explanation is in order for someone to lien you with LEGAL tender of $500.00 dollars either by a corporate entity or government corporation they will have to pay a sustainable amount in your case because of the 100 million dollar lien against the straw man name JOHN DOE, This makes you immune period.
Other benefits are protection from Judgments, Summons, Traffic Tickets, Loans, Incarceration, Child Support, Credit of any kind, Court fees, Anything related to a Debt lien becomes inert.
Also you as the living being securities creditor you can exercise the right to “LIEN THEM” using UCC system the bankers created, this gives you your power back, Coming from a higher position you have the ability to put these corporations and Usurped gov agents in their place.
HOUSE RESOLUTION HR192.
Other more advance features are available in a different package are as follows
You can also discharge most debts via IRS such as cars, utility bills, credit cards, Etcetera, That's right the IRS is your personal accountant for the corporate fictitious character name and you as the agent representative and executor of the account created you are the creditor and the debtor at the same time every time you sign a security and Since their's only legal tender available aKa federal reserve notes dollars and no real money is available to us such as “LAWFUL” coinage gold and silver as our beloved constitution states the only thing we can do is DISCHARGE via IRS,This process is call added for value or A4V.
What have we learn?
FREEDOM SOVEREINGTY BY LIENING YOUR STRAWMAN WITH $100 MILLION DOLLARS?
THE STRAWMAN IS THE LEGAL PERSON WITH YOUR NAME IN ALL-CAPITAL LETTERS
WARNING: This is usually too weird for people to grasp at first but FREEDOM motivates
==============================
Living Persons (people), exist in a real world.
LEGAL PERSONS (corporations) exist in a fictional world.
Governments, Corporations, Agencies, FICTICIOUS CORPORATIONS, etc. are examples of a LEGAL PERSON.
LEGAL PERSONS can only deal directly with other LEGAL PERSONS (agencies, states, etc.)
LEGAL PERSONS can not deal directly with Living Persons (You).
In order for a LEGAL PERSONS to deal with Living Persons, there must be a connection, a go-between.
To establish a connection, a FICTIONAL LEGAL PERSON was deceitfully created by the government.
For that purpose, your lawful name of birth right was fraudulently replaced with a LEGAL NAME.
Your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is not you, the living flesh and blood person.
Your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is the STRAWMAN (a fiction just make belief).
This was accomplished without your knowledge by using your birth certificates as the MCO (manufacturers certificate of origin) and the state in which you were born was used as the port of entry. (Admiralty Law - watch the video).
The artificial person created by law a with Your Name in ALL-CAPITAL LETTERS is the STRAWMAN.
This fraudulent act gives Government a LEGAL PERSON with whom to deal directly.
The LEGAL PERSON has Your Name but in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
The LEGAL PERSON is your STRAWMAN.
Legally, since Your birth, the STRAWMAN has been considered a debt slave.
Under such a fraudulent arrangement, You volunteer to take responsibility for the STRAWMAN.
The STRAWMAN is under government jurisdiction.
You are not under government jurisdiction, unless You volunteer to answer for the STRAWMAN by foolishly representing the STRAWMAN (YOURSELF) in court.
When You distinguish yourself as another party than the STRAWMAN, the two are separated.
You can distinguish yourself from the STRAWMAN in ONE DAY FLAT by filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement with a Security Agreement (use the templates).
Filing a UCC-1 Financing Statesment does 3 things for You.
a) - First, gain limited control over the funds in the account. This allows You to also move entries, figures, & digits for Your benefit.
b) You can become the holder in due course of the STRAWMAN.
c) - You have a $100 MILLION DOLLAR LIEN on the STRAWMAN (the lien is the thing)
The filing the UCC-1 Financing Statement gives You virtual ownership of the STRAWMAN.
You hold the claim, the superior claim, if any Government or CORPORATION wants to lien your STRAWMAN, they must pay your claim off first.
Some people see this as a form of Sovereignty?
Confusing? - Don't let it be! You can do this IN ONE DAY by editing, printing, signing, and filing your UCC-1 and Security Agreement once done..
Money Quotes
The United States Constitution prohibits states from declaring legal tender anything other than gold or silver but does not limit Congress' power to declare what shall be legal tender for all debts ... Federal Reserve Notes are taxable dollars. Coinage Act of 1965, §102, 31 USCA §392; USCA Const. Art. 1, §10.
Those who hold that the constitution should be interpreted very strictly believe the Federal Reserve System and paper money are unconstitutional. Sharing the interpretive philosophy of Thomas Jefferson, they argue that Congress has only those powers which the constitution specifically enumerates. If the power is not explicitly granted, then the federal government simply does not have it. Therefore, the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional because Congress does not have the specific power to create a central bank. In addition, the federal government's power to create money -- lawful money -- is limited only to minting gold or silver coins; paper currency is forbidden.
Package Includes :
The UCC-1 financing Statement
Done PROPERLY with a 100 million dollar lien on all Adverse Parties Aka-JOHN DOE and All US states Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports known as Slush Funds that were hidden from you and is worth trillions.
These Slush funds were generated by your Signatures each time you went to the store or bank or any tickets, or contracts that you had to sign by these Government Officials, and were sold to other foreign investors for millions of dollars because you're enrolled into the FEDERAL UNITED STATES CORPORATION via your Birth Certificate or Naturalization Certificate where these powers have basically usurp and taken control over our lives.
So therefore you operate as their Employee especially when using your Social Security Number which is your Employee Number.
With this Package done properly you know longer are owned by these authorities and that You demand your Secure Party Status which is "You The Live man" has put a Lien on that Birth Certificate which created the Artificial PERSON or DEAD ENTITY that is your name in All Capital Letters.
They will no longer have any power over you.
But you can still operate in commerce but with all rights reserved and fully protected.
This brings you into the status as a Non-adverse Non-Belligerent Non Adverse Party Protecting you under the Geneva Conventions stating via UCC-1 that You are Not at war with them, Remember They still operate in War Power Status Act as Adverse Parties.
The Security Agreement:
Is a PRIVATE Contract between you and your Straw man which gives the Secure Party Power to use whatever the straw man owns or that is under his name as the SPCs Collateral.
With this powerful Contract The Straw man can no longer be involved in any contract unless they have 100 million dollars to pay.
The Power of Attorney General:
Is a very powerful Document giving the Secure party full Power of Attorney to act in the presence of the Straw man and will take care of all of his accounts for him.
You will need to make donation of $300.00 in cash us dollars will barter in gold or silver of equal value.
Will also accept US postal mail money order, Moneygram, Western Union.
Money issues no worries I understand , We can work some out.
==================================================
Please send a scanned copy of your birth certificate, Drivers license, Address of place of birth , Telephone and address you wish to use.
1. After all services are done on our end a copy of originals will be given to applicants by mail or hand delivered.
2. The applicant must then notarized all 3 documents.
3. Next take to Secretary of State and have it Apostilled.
Apostille Agents
1440 Veteran Ave
Ste 210
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Serving Los Angeles and surrounding area
Neighborhoods: West Los Angeles, Westwood
(310) 995-8225
http://www.caapostilleagents.com
4. Last step take it to county recorder and have filed on the public record and also get a few certified copies for yourself.
Please contact me via email only for questions.
Thank you
freedomfromdarkness@live.com
Become a Secure Party Creditor Service for only $300.00
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)